Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding -Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife under an indictment which charged him with murder by kicking, stamping and beating her.
The State’s case by the evidence supports the charging part of the indictment, t-o the extent at least of showing that he did whip, beat and kick his wife, and from this1 treatment she later died. The physician who attended her shows it was within a few days after this treatment she died and that the bruises produced internal injuries of such a nature that peritonitis set in and produced her death. There seems to be no doubt from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Medina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Highsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Kennamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Crum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Sadler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Sadler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.