Legal Opinion
Royse v. Grage
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 27, 1934No. 31,407PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*780The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for malpractice. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The pertinent part of plaintiff’s petition reads as follows:
“That at all times herein mentioned defendant was and now is a practicing physician and surgeon in the city of Wichita, Kansas.
“That on or about the 22d day of June, 1931, plaintiff, by reason of a severe fall, had broken, dislocated, bruised and injured her right arm, shoulder and collar bone, and that on said date and for several days thereafter the said defendant, as such physician…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Eberhardt Lumber Co. v. LecuyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Hawkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Royse v. GrageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959