Legal Opinion · Dissent

McNamara v. Hammerslag

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1884Published

1Dissent

McKEE, J., Dissenting.

I dissent. The allegations of the complaint are that, in an action, a writ of attachment was issued, which was levied on certain property belonging to the defendant in the action; that for the purpose of having the property attached released from the attachment, “the defendants herein executed and delivered to the plaintiff a written undertaking, a copy of which is hereto attached, marked exhibit ‘A,’ and made a part of this complaint”; and that upon the execution and delivery of the bond, the attachment was discharged and the property was released, yet the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Los Angeles v. SignoretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Coburn v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Laveaga v. WiseNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Percival v. McCoyUnited States Circuit Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API