Legal Opinion

Findlay v. Monroe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

The subject of this suit is a Cadillac automobile seized as contraband property by a conservation officer of our Game and Fish Division on the ground that there was being transported in that automobile a deer which had been illegally killed, Chapter 115, Public Acts of 1951, Sections 42 and 45, respectively, Williams’ Code Supplement at Sections 5178.71 and 5178.74. Mrs. Monroe, defendant-in-error, is the wife of Yerlie Monroe who was driving this automobile at that time. He was subsequently convicted for the illegal possession and transportation of this deer. Monroe v. State, 194 Tenn. 519,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Clements Paper Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. B. E. Dodd v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Monroe v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bearman v. CamatsosTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dispeker v. New Southern Hotel CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bradford v. Martin Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Blair v. MayoTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cooper v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API