Legal Opinion
United States v. Mutschelknaus
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided July 9, 2008No. 3:08-cv-00017PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS
DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motions to Suppress Evidence filed on June 13, 2008, and June 23, 2008. See Docket Nos. 21 and 24. The Government filed responses in opposition to the motions on June 25, 2008, and July 2, 2008. See Docket Nos. 27 and 28. The Defendant filed reply briefs on July 2, 2008, and July 7, 2008. See Docket Nos. 29 and 30. The Defendant filed an amended reply brief on July 8, 2008. See Docket No. 31. The Court denies the motions for the reasons set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 19,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BrunetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert Lawrence GabrioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Donald SyphersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. MetterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- People v. DeProsperoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- United States v. CoteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. CameronDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- DEPROSPERO, STEPHEN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.