Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hamill

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1941No. 8,103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff obtained a judgment by default against the defendant. Defendant’s motion to set aside the default and judg ment being denied, he appealed from the judgment. The sole question for consideration is whether the court had jurisdiction to enter the judgment complained of. Jurisdiction is challenged on several grounds, which will hereafter be separately considered.

The facts involved are these: The plaintiff’s complaint was filed on August 19, 1939. On the same day summons was issued; likewise on the same day plaintiff filed an undertaking on attachment and an affidavit for attachment, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Schmidt v. SchmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. EmbodyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peoples National Bank v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Clinton v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Clinton v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API