Legal Opinion
State v. Shahid
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1991No. 58005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons ... against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated....” U.S. Const. Amend. IV. “[T]he people shall be secure in their persons ... from unreasonable searches and seizures ...” Mo. Const. Art. I, § 15. In an effort to obtain a new trial and ultimately a dismissal of charges, defendant, Abuwi Sha-hid, contends the trial court erred in not suppressing and allowing in evidence a “packet of cocaine” which police testified he threw to the ground and a “packet of cocaine” subsequently seized from defendant at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State v. FainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. TwittyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. CroninNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HernandezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. BoykinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.