Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Nessle

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1843Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The defendant is now entitled to security for costs, although the next friend of the infant plaintiff may be abundantly able to pay. (2 R. 8. 620, § 1.) Application may he made to a judge at chambers for an order to file security, or show cause; or the application may be made to the court in the first instance, on notice. (Champlin v. Pierce, 3 Wend. 445.) The motion is regular.

Motion granted.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Champlin v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1830