J.W.J., Jr. v. P.K.R.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMurdock, Judge
I agree with the fundamental principles upon which the main opinion is ultimately grounded, and accordingly I concur in overruling M.U. v. K.W., 751 So.2d 22 (Ala.Civ.App.1999). I concur in the result, rather than fully concurring in the main opinion, because the main opinion posits as correct certain notions that I do not believe to be correct. Because I cannot foresee down what “roads” those notions might lead us in some future case, I am compelled to explain my concerns and to set out what I believe to be the correct analytical route to the result reached. In so doing, I necessarily…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ex Parte K.L.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- R.S.C. v. J.B.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- L.B.S. v. L.M.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- K.R.D. v. E.D.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.