Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 2, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-275-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Judge.

The petitioner (defendant) was convicted of robbery and sentenced to an eighteen-year term of imprisonment as a repetitive offender.

In this petition for post-conviction relief, the defendant presents a novel issue. The trial court at sentencing gave the defendant pre-sentence incarceration credit for more days than defendant actually served. At a later hearing the trial judge corrected that error by a “nunc pro tunc” order. To compound the problem, the “nunc pro tunc” order occurred after the sentence had been appealed and affirmed. (State v. Lee, 1 CA-CR 10147, July 7,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. TyreeArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. AmbalongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Lowe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API