Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Coe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2003No. 01-2488-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) appeals from the report and recommendation of the referee that concluded that the OLR failed to establish that Attorney Rocky Coe violated SCR 20:3.10 in a letter he sent to opposing counsel. Attorney Coe cross-appeals from several aspects of the referee's report and recommendation. He specifically objects to the referee's recommendation that this court admonish Attorney Coe for disrespectful conduct toward the referee.

¶ 2. We adopt the recommendation of the referee and agree that the OLR has failed to establish, under the facts of this case, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rush v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against SwartwoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Aspen Services, Inc. v. IT Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Pandeli v. MAJESZCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API