In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Coe
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) appeals from the report and recommendation of the referee that concluded that the OLR failed to establish that Attorney Rocky Coe violated SCR 20:3.10 in a letter he sent to opposing counsel. Attorney Coe cross-appeals from several aspects of the referee's report and recommendation. He specifically objects to the referee's recommendation that this court admonish Attorney Coe for disrespectful conduct toward the referee.
¶ 2. We adopt the recommendation of the referee and agree that the OLR has failed to establish, under the facts of this case, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Rush v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against SwartwoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Aspen Services, Inc. v. IT Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Pandeli v. MAJESZCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Taysheedra Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020