In re Rose Marie M.

— On the court’s own motion, its decision, dated November 15, 1982 [90 AD2d 810], is amended by striking therefrom, the first paragraph on page 2 commencing with the words, “We note that * * * ” and terminates with “(subd 3, par [g])” and by substituting therefore the following: “We note that the same due process deficiency permeated the former comparable provisions of section 384-b of the Social Services Law in force at the time the fact finding adjudications in the *1010instant proceedings were made, but amended during the course of this appeal (L 1982, ch 123, § 1). The former provisions…