Legal Opinion

People v. Grass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The complaining witnesses, Alexander Fox and Bernard Friedman, were employed by the Manhattan Lithograph Company, Inc., during the month of September, 1938, at a weekly compensation of thirty-five dollars. Friedman was working as production manager, and Fox was known as contact man, salesman and estimator. They were discharged on September 30, 1938. It is claimed that the wages of each, due for the two preceding weeks, amounting to seventy-five dollars, had not been paid. For the corporation’s alleged failure to pay these wages in the manner provided by the Labor Law, defendant, who is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. People v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. VetriNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Watson v. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Parker v. Revlon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. RowanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API