Legal Opinion

Ehly v. Cady

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-065Published

1Opinion of the Court

687 P.2d 687 (1984)

Ray E. EHLY, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Dorothy V. CADY, Bruce M. Cady, and Cassandra Joanne Cady, Defendants and Appellants, and

James A. Ussin, d/b/a U Bar S Real Estate, Defendant, Cross-Claimant, and Respondent.

No. 83-65.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted May 24, 1984.

Decided August 28, 1984.

Rehearing Denied September 27, 1984.

Hooks & Budewitz, Patrick F. Hooks argued, Townsend, Moore, Rice, O'Connell & Refling, Bozeman, for defendants and appellants.

McDougal, Meloche, Love & Eckis, Lynn McDougal argued, El Cajon, Cal., Huppert & Swindlehurst, P.C., Livingston, for Ehly.

C…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Foy v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ehly v. CadyMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Smith v. ZeppMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API