Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)

I

{¶ 60} The majority holds that the appellate court correctly held that the trial court erred in including a jury instruction on foreseeability, but concludes that *274the appellate court failed to show that the jury instructions materially prejudiced the Cromers. The majority opinion is weighted with syllabus paragraphs, but all the syllabus paragraphs in the world cannot change the fact that the sole, unremarkable holding of this case is that the appellate court did not do enough to show that the jury instructions it correctly held were erroneous were prejudicial. But here is the rub: that…