Johnson v. R. T. K. Petroleum Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
On this record it was error to hold as a matter of law that the co-defendant driver and owner of the truck was an independent contractor rather than a servant of the corporate defendant. The nature of the relationship existing was a question of fact which the trier of the facts resolved in favor of the plaintiff. (See Braxton v. Mendelsohn, 233 N. Y. 122; Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co., 254 N. Y. 60; Irwin v. Klein, 271 N. Y. 477; Fritz v. Krasne, 273 N. Y. 649.) The evidence sustains that finding.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Irwin v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Fritz v. KrasneNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Employers Insurance v. Goble Aircraft Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Victor Carrion v. Orbit Messenger, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hernandez v. Chefs Diet Delivery, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bermudez v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bratt v. Midland Asphalt Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.