Legal Opinion

Crosson v. Lion Oil Refining Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The record shows that the pipe line of the plaintiff was broken in some unaccountable way, and the crude oil therein contained flowed off the right-of-way of the plaintiff down a small watercourse on the land occupied and controlled by the defendants, and part of the crude oil was diverted from the watercourse into a mud or oil pit on the land controlled by the defendants.

It is the claim of the defendants that they acquired title to the oil which escaped from the pipe line of the plaintiff and flowed on the land controlled by them.

There is no statute in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eads v. BrazeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  2. Sheldon v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Duvall v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Walker v. DuncanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gentry v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Terry v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Standard Oil Company of La. v. Oil Well SalvageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Sharkiewicz v. LeponeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Davenport v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Champlin Exploration, Inc. v. Western Bridge & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API