People v. Kozlow
New York Court of Appeals
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Pigott, J.
We hold that a defendant charged with attempted dissemination of indecent material to minors in the first degree under Penal Law § 110.00 and former § 235.22 (L 1996, ch 600, § 6) may properly be convicted under that statute even though his communications contained no nude or sexual images.
I
On March 4, 2004, defendant Jeffrey Kozlow entered an Internet chat room and, by instant messaging, approached a person with the screen name “JohnInYonkers914,” who immediately gave his age as 14. “[I]’m 42; [I]’m into younger guys,” Kozlow wrote, “u into guys my age?”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. KozlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WichtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.