Stanley Carl Rhinehart v. J. B. Gunn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Stanley Carl Rhinehart appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the district court.
Under Meeks v. Craven, 482 F.2d 465, 466-68 (9th Cir. 1973), a state prisoner can successfully attack a state conviction in a federal habeas corpus challenge on self-representation grounds only if the prisoner made an unequivocal demand in the state court to be allowed to represent himself. In the § 2254 proceeding, the district court may rely on the opinion of the state courts on the factual underpinning of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Joseph Anthony Meeks v. Walter Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Horace B. Turner v. Abe ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anthony Lee Chaney v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Lloyd E. Bramlett, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Michael Knaubert v. Goldsmith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cesar Ramirez Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, Superintendent, California Institution for Men at ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.