Legal Opinion

Stanley Carl Rhinehart v. J. B. Gunn

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1979No. 77-3855PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Stanley Carl Rhinehart appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the district court.

Under Meeks v. Craven, 482 F.2d 465, 466-68 (9th Cir. 1973), a state prisoner can successfully attack a state conviction in a federal habeas corpus challenge on self-representation grounds only if the prisoner made an unequivocal demand in the state court to be allowed to represent himself. In the § 2254 proceeding, the district court may rely on the opinion of the state courts on the factual underpinning of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph Anthony Meeks v. Walter Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Horace B. Turner v. Abe ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anthony Lee Chaney v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Lloyd E. Bramlett, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Michael Knaubert v. Goldsmith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Cesar Ramirez Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, Superintendent, California Institution for Men at ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API