Legal Opinion
Van Wagener v. MacFarland
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1922No. Civ. No. 3954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to secure an injunction restraining the defendants from issuing and causing to be sold bonds in the amount of three hundred and sixty thousand dollars of the Conley School District, county of Kern. The relief prayed for was denied. Plaintiff has appealed. The questions involved arise upon the judgment-roll.
The regularity and manner in which the bond election was conducted are not claimed to have been invalid. The whole contention advanced by appellant concerns the matter of the organization of the Conley School District, par ticularly as to portions which it is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- People ex rel. Quisenberry v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- People ex rel. Hoffman v. HechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- California Grape & Tree Fruit League v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Henderson v. School District No. 44Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Crowl v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Williams v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.