Ross v. State

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant was informed against and convicted of the crime of grand larceny. The appellant’s first point on appeal is directed to whether or not his conviction for grand larceny was supported by substantial and competent evidence.

The appellant was charged with the theft of one hundred and forty-six silver dollars, a valuable watch, and other coins and jewelry of value exceeding one hundred dollars. Evidence in the form of witnesses’ testimony was presented to the trial judge, who, sitting in his capacity as trier of fact, certainly had before him sufficient and competent evidence…