Legal Opinion

Faughnan v. Ross

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1943No. 14655PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

1. In this State, the writ of habeas corpus will lie, not only by “any person restrained of his liberty” or by any person who is “interested” in such restraint even '“from humanity alone” (Broomhead v. Chisolm, 47 Ga. 390 (6), 394), but also the writ will lie in .behalf of “any person alleging that another . . is kept illegally from the custody of the applicant.” Code, 60-101. Our statute thus provides for two different kinds of habeas corpus: one by a person restrained or by some one in his behalf, such as was “known to the common law as the habeas corpus ad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Robertson v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Broomhead v. ChisolmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Haynes v. Thrift Credit UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API