Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff/counter-Claim-Defendant/appellee v. Toyota of Visalia, Inc., Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1993No. 91-16488Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
988 F.2d 126
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Counter-Claim-Defendant/Appellee,
v.
TOYOTA OF VISALIA, INC., Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant.
No. 91-16488.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993.
Decided Feb. 16, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Piarulle v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Jimmie J. And Bonnie M. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Crown Willamette Paper Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.