Legal Opinion

Buffkin v. Pridgen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1930No. 12801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

This is an action for damages on account of certain slanderous words alleged to have been spoken by the defendant of and concerning the plaintiff, Inez Buff-kin. The defendant demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient, in several particulars named, to constitute a cause of action, and, from an adverse holding by his Honor, Judge Shipp, he appeals and brings error.

This Court is satisfied, from a careful reading of the complaint, that a cause of action is stated. The words alleged to have been…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drakeford v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Stokes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Renew v. SerbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API