Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Brazelton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1927No. 452. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

This suit was instituted by appellee to recover from appellant damages which he claims to have suffered by reason of the loss of an eye, which he alleged wa? caused by reason of a defective hammer he was using as a machinist in the shops of appellant in Waco. The cause was tried to a jury, submitted on special issues, and, based on the jury’s findings, judgment was rendered for appellee. Hence this appeal.

A number of appellant’s assignments of error relate to its requested charge for an instructed verdict, and to the alleged error on the part of the court in rendering judgment because the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emberlin v. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Wichita Falls. R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. EmberlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Bruyere v. Liberty Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. City of Mart v. HasseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Parker v. MillerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadows & Walker Drilling Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Brazelton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Davis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Meadows & Walker Drilling Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API