Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 29, 1802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Upon a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Franklin District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The first error assigned is in the following words: “It does not appear by the return of the sheriff, nor by anything else in the record, that a copy of the bill was ever delivered to the defendant in the court below; without which it could not be taken for confessed.” The act of 1799, entitled “an act to amend the several *163acts regulating proceedings in chancery,” was relied on to support this objection ; the first section of which having expressly directed that a copy of the bill shall be delivered to the defendant by the officer or person serving the subpoena, which delivery shall be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bannon v. Patrick Bannon Sewer Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'n v. DevineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API