PNC Bank, Delaware v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
In this appeal from the Superior Court, we consider a question of first impression: whether the twenty day time period for requesting a trial de novo under Superior Court Civil Rule 16.1(h)(1), following an arbi trator’s decision, is subject to enlargement. We conclude that the period is not a jurisdictional barrier but is subject to enlargement under Superior Court Civil Rule 6(b). Accordingly, we affirm.
I
The Superior Court proceedings began as a debt action on a promissory note. The plaintiff-appellant, PNC Bank, Delaware (“PNC”), filed suit against defendants William H. Hudson and Alice P.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Fisher v. BiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Eller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Giordano v. MartaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Middlecap Associates, LLC v. The Town of MiddletownSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
- Reed v. DNRECSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
- Sandonato v. HorseySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Simpson v. State Farm Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2021