Legal Opinion

PNC Bank, Delaware v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 1997No. 312, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from the Superior Court, we consider a question of first impression: whether the twenty day time period for requesting a trial de novo under Superior Court Civil Rule 16.1(h)(1), following an arbi trator’s decision, is subject to enlargement. We conclude that the period is not a jurisdictional barrier but is subject to enlargement under Superior Court Civil Rule 6(b). Accordingly, we affirm.

I

The Superior Court proceedings began as a debt action on a promissory note. The plaintiff-appellant, PNC Bank, Delaware (“PNC”), filed suit against defendants William H. Hudson and Alice P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Fisher v. BiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Eller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giordano v. MartaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Middlecap Associates, LLC v. The Town of MiddletownSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  3. Reed v. DNRECSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  4. Sandonato v. HorseySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  5. Simpson v. State Farm Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API