Legal Opinion
H.M. v. E.T.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*849Although we agree with the appellant that, under the unique circumstances of this case, the Family Court should not have dismissed her objections to the order of support entered March 18, 2009, on the ground that she failed to file them in a timely fashion (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; see generally Matter of Ogborn v Hilts, 262 AD2d 857, 858 [1999]; Matter of Onondaga County Commr. of Social Servs. v Joe W.C., 233 AD2d 908, 908 [1996]; Matter of Corcoran v Stuart, 215 AD2d 340, 341 [1995]), we conclude that the objections were properly dismissed on alternative grounds. Specifically, as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- H.M. v. E.T.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Renee XX. v. John ZZ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ogborn v. HiltsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gittens v. Chin-OnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brasfield v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Matter of Benzaquen v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Scott v. Jacques-ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017