Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 2009No. 35 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*370BATTAGLIA, Judge.

Petitioner, Dion G. Tucker, invites us to explore the application of our decision in Smith v. State, 388 Md. 468, 880 A.2d 288 (2005), to a sentence included in a cross-racial identification jury instruction. In doing so, we do not address whether such an instruction was appropriate in the case at bar, but whether, once given, the instruction was a correct statement of the law. We granted certiorari, Tucker v. State, 405 Md. 290, 950 A.2d 828 (2008), with respect to the following question:

Did the trial court err in granting the State’s jury instruction regarding cross-racial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Diggs and Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. COLEMAN-FULLER v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API