Heffron v. Hanaford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Hanaford, Tristram and Webber, as copartners doing business under the name of Tristram & Webber, were sued on an endorsement made in the copartnership name, upon a note purporting to be given by another copartnership doing business under the name of Reynolds & Prince. The evidence showed that the note was given by the firm last named to obtain a release from execution levy in favor of Heffron of certain property levied upon as the property of Prince, one of its members, and that Webber endorsed it in the firm name of Tristram & Webber. No showing was made that Hanaford ever consented to this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Livingston v. RooseveltNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Laverty v. BurrNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by7 opinions
- Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Hester v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
- Randall v. KnevalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Slipp v. HartleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Lewin v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.