Vander Wagen v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
In this matter the successful plaintiffs in a mortgage foreclosure action have appealed from the trial court’s denial of their motion (filed more than thirteen months after the entry of the original foreclosure judgment) to amend the foreclosure judgment so as to insert language permitting the plaintiffs to pursue the defendants for a deficiency remaining after the foreclosure. Because of the nature of the contentions urged by the parties, we find it necessary to set forth in detail the chronological sequence of events occurring subsequent to the time the trial court directed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Greater Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GleesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. ConlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Sloan v. Florida-Vanderbilt Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Leahy v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Webb v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.