Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Brignole

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1901No. Sac. No. 721PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Amador County settling the final accounts of executors, and from an order fixing the value of legal services. R. C. Rust, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This is an appeal taken by one of three executors from a decree of final settlement and an order fixing the value of legal services. The estate was valued at ninety-four thousand dollars. The administration was all fair sailing. There was no dispute or controversy about anything. It was a mere matter of going through the forms and waiting for the lapse of the time required. In the final settlement the court allowed, on account of the services rendered, two of the executors $750, and the same amount for the appellant, Morizio, for the services of his attorneys. Certainly, this was enough,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Carmody v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. In Re Springer's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Estate of BillingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Estate of ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Gerrish v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API