Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1970No. D. D. No. 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

As the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline pointed out in their findings of fact and recommendation, respondent had many years experience as a lawyer, and further had many years of experience as an accountant. He was dealing with inexperienced, young clients who trusted him completely because he had represented their parents for a long period. He had a lawyer’s professional obligation not to acquire an interest adverse to his clients, not to represent conflicting *12interests except with their consent, and not to accept employment as a lawyer without first disclosing to these…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re Reinstatement of MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API