Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
As the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline pointed out in their findings of fact and recommendation, respondent had many years experience as a lawyer, and further had many years of experience as an accountant. He was dealing with inexperienced, young clients who trusted him completely because he had represented their parents for a long period. He had a lawyer’s professional obligation not to acquire an interest adverse to his clients, not to represent conflicting *12interests except with their consent, and not to accept employment as a lawyer without first disclosing to these…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Reinstatement of MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Stark County Bar Ass'n v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003