Legal Opinion

Bayersdorfer & Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1909No. 59PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Application for Review of a Decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the importers from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers affirming the classification of the' collector in respect to a large and varied assortment of imported ornamental florists’ supplies, as follows: “Ruscus grun,” “Areca blatter,” “Cycas leaves,” “Magnolia wreath,” “Ilex wreath,” “Ruscus cross,” “Tull leaf,” “Adiantum fern,” “Ruscus wreath,” “Phcenix leaves,” “Leaves in form of cross,” “Palm leaf wreath.”

The appraiser at this port returned these importations as “ornamental leaves,” and the collector classified them as such, and assessed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kreshower v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API