Legal Opinion
Hessenn Group LLC v. InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00794Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HESSENN GROUP LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00794-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED 14 INNERSCOPE HEARING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 16) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Hessenn Group LLC moves the Court for default judgment against defendant 19 InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc. (“InnerScope”).1 (ECF No. 16.) Specifically, plaintiff 20 seeks a default judgment against defendant for damages in the amount of $2,247,975.83 plus 21…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.