Legal Opinion
Hobson v. Ratp Dev USA
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 22, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1729Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SINALOA HOBSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1729 (CKK) RATP DEV USA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 22, 2023) Plaintiff Sinaloa Hobson brings claims of discrimination against Defendants RATP Dev USA and DC Streetcar. Plaintiff was an employee of RATP Dev USA from April 27, 2020 until her termination on May 7, 2021. Compl. ¶¶ 9, 19. She identifies DC Streetcar as a subsidiary of RATP Dev USA. Id. ¶ 3. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e, et seq.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.