Legal Opinion
Schilz v. City of Taylor
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 22, 1986No. 85-CV-73300-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Veterans’ Re-employment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 2021, et seq., contending that defendants have unlawfully denied him the police officer’s (patrolman’s) seniority date which he would have attained but for his intervening military service. The case is presently before the Court for final disposition on plaintiff’s and defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment as so stipulated by counsel.
Summary judgment is appropriate where no genuine issue of material fact remains to be decided and the moving…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Douglas K. Schilz v. City of Taylor, Michigan, and Fire and Police Civil Service Commission, an Office of the City of TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987