Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seligson v. Victory Pool, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 31, 1946Published

1DissentEder, J.

The action is in negligence.- The defendant operated a public swimming pool; the infant plaintiff was a patron; she was accompanied by a friend; they paid their admission fee; they entered at 10:00 a.m. and spent some time on the beach; about 1:00 p.m. they entered the pool; about 4:00 p.m. the infant plaintiff met with an accident; her foot was injured by being cut due to a broken bottle on the bottom of the pool.

*1069Bottled beverages were sold in the vicinity of the pool; there is no proof as to who threw in the broken bottle, nor how long it remained in the pool.

The defendant had two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Ryan v. Cortland Carriage Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Favro v. Troy & West Troy Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API