Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. Darnell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from that part of the judgment which reversed the judgment against defendant-respondent Rosen and dismissed the complaint as to her dismissed, with costs to defendant-respondent Rosen, upon the ground that defendant-appellant is not an aggrieved party (see, e.g., Nekris v. Yellen, 302 N. Y. 626; Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N. Y. 124, 129), and, in all other respects, judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs-respondents. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Nekris v. YellenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gouchie v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Tenenbaum v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Wright v. MorozinisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. North Shore Hospital v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Mattis-Loguiratto v. RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995