Legal Opinion

Foster Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Ideal Bedding Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis (Edmund H.), J.

By this action the plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from the use of a corporate name, including the word “ Ideal,” in the manufacture or sale of beds, bed springs, mattresses, pillows or articles used therewith.

From the record before the court it appears that the plaintiff was incorporated in 1893 for the purpose of manufacturing and selling wire springs, spring beds, woven wire mattresses and bedroom furniture. In the course of its business development it adopted and has registered as a trade-mark the word “ Ideal ” which word has been extensively used over a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Mitchel H. Mark Realty Corp. v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API