Legal Opinion

United States v. Talley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 17, 2009No. Criminal Action 03-511 (RWR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Defendant Rickey Lamont Talley filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his plea, convictions, and sentence arguing that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by guaranteeing that the sentence would be at or below the statutory minimum, and that he was denied due process by being sentenced under sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine offenses which were unduly harsh and have since been lowered. Because Talley’s § 2255 motion was not timely filed, the ineffective assistance of counsel claim is conclusory and unsupported, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FaisonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Hoover-Hankerson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. United States v. SuttonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. United States v. AllenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. United States v. Hoover-HankersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API