Legal Opinion
Manza v. Newhard
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 20, 2012No. 11-2256-cvUnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs Paul T. Manza and an entity under his control, Domar Homestead, LLC, (hereinafter “Manza”), appeal the dismissal of their complaint for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 charging the Village of Warwick, Village Mayor Michael Newhard, and Town Attorney Michael D. Meth with violations of the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution in connection with the cancellation of water service to Manza’s property, an action subsequently reversed by the New York State Supreme Court in a post-deprivation Article 78 proceeding. See Decision & Order, Manza v. Wendel,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dellutri v. Village of ElmsfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Zeigler v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Gizzo v. Ben-HabibDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Mar-Cone Appliance Parts Co. v. ManganDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Manza v. NewhardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.