Legal Opinion
Medlyn v. Ananieff
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 14, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The essential facts of this case as they appear in the finding are these: The plaintiff made a loan to the defendant, Ananieff, secured by collateral consisting of a stamp collection. These parties rented a safe deposit box from the First National Bank & Trust Company of Bridgeport. The contract under which the box was rented was signed by both Medlyn and Ananieff and witnessed, and provided that, “(We) the undersigned hereby rent and agree to hold Safe Deposit Box No. 540 in the First National Bank & Trust Co., Bridgeport, Conn.” They agreed to conform to the rules and regulations of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Safe Deposit Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Trainer v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Trowbridge v. SpinningWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Carples v. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Tillinghast v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moldenhauer v. MoldenhauerConnecticut Superior Court · 1942
- Moldenhauer v. MoldenhauerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1942