Legal Opinion · Dissent

Valspar Corp. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 18, 1949No. 53, Docket 21046Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

Petitioner’s contention here — accepted by my brethren — seems to me to prove altogether too much; I think it can be demonstrated to lead to the conclusion that every promise to pay dividends out of earnings, i. e., to do what the law- requires, is an- adequate basis for the statutory credit. And this is contrary to the original and leading case of Helvering v. Northwest *175Steel Rolling Mills, 311 U.S. 46, 61 S.Ct. 109, 85 L.Ed. 29, and the precedents following it.

The contract here involved, upon scrutiny, appears to come to this, that no dividends shall be paid except out of net earnings, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Glenn v. Chess & Wymond, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Hobbs-Western Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Railway Express Agency v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Chess & Wymond, Inc. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API