Legal Opinion
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 2, 2000No. Nos. 98-1377, 99-1103PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
On October 10, 1996, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. (“SEL”) sued Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung *1371Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging that Samsung’s production and sales of active matrix displays infringed SEL’s U.S. Patent No. 5,543,636 (“the ’636 patent”) directed to semiconductor technology. The district court first granted SEL’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Samsung’s federal and New Jersey Racketeer Influenced…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Humana Inc. v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Lit.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- University of West Virginia, Board of Trustees v. VanvoorhiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Synthon IP, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.