Hiner v. Hiner
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County granting an allowance pending an action for maintenance. Emmett Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff is the wife of defendant and brings the action for separate maintenance for herself and three children of the marriage. The complaint alleges that in October, 1902, plaintiff and defendant were residing together in the county of Chehalis, state of Washington, and that in said month defendant abandoned and willfully deserted plaintiff and has never returned to plaintiff or to their said 'residence, but still continues to abandon and desert plaintiff; that defendant came to California shortly after October, 1902, “and is now a bona fide resident of Sonoma County”; that “plaintiff ever…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Benton v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. AmorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974