Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Zehmer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 16, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to judgment of corporation court of the city of Manchester, rendered 6th February, 1885, in an action of ejectment, wherein Eliza Zehmer and others were plaintiffs and James F. Bradley and others were defendants. Judgment was for the plaintiffs, and the defendants, having excepted to various rulings of the court below, obtained a writ of error and supersedeas from one of the judges, of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

The defendants in error instituted an action of ejectment against the plaintiffs, in error for the recovery of a certain lot situated in the city of Manchester. The plaintiffs recovered in the said action and the defendants brought the case here by writ of error. A brief statement of the facts are necessary, and the case is as follows:

In 1827, Charles Zehmer devised the real estate in question in the following language: “I lend to my son, Charles G. Zehmer all my real estate during his natural life, and give to his heirs and their heirs forever the said real estate with all and singular the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wootton v. Redd's ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855
  2. Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  3. Blackwell's Adm'r v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  4. Shenandoah Valley Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  5. Tebbs v. DuvalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pillow v. Southwest Virginia Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. Seefried v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  4. Phippen v. DurhamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  5. Phippen v. DurhamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API