Legal Opinion
Skil Corporation v. Rockwell International Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 6, 1974No. 74 C 22PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AUSTIN, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin alleged violation of Section. 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 1125(a)), 1 to enjoin various forms of unfair competition, and to obtain an accounting of gains and profits derived from defendant’s illegal activities, as well as judgment for compensatory damages. Original federal jurisdiction of the Lanham Act claim is predicated upon 15 U.S.C.A. § 1121, 2 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338(a). 3 Pendent federal jurisdiction is alleged with respect to the unfair competition claims under Illinois law, relying upon 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338(b). 4
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Bernard Food Industries, Inc. v. The Dietene CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Warner Bros., Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- 20th Century Wear, Inc., Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sanmark-Stardust Inc. And Domino Industries, Inc., Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch RubberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.