Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Lippman.

The question before the Court is whether the evidence in this case was legally sufficient to convict the defendant of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. We hold that it was.

*488In March 2007, as part of a criminal investigation, New York City Police Detective Steven Goetz interviewed a complainant who provided him with the name, photograph, and phone number of a possible suspect whom she identified as Devine Perez. Goetz called the phone number and spoke to a person who identified himself as Devine Perez and who told Goetz that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. The People v. Jafari LamontNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. HadfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API