Legal Opinion

Slater v. Drescher

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Erie county. Action by Jonathan I. Slater against Casper J. Drescher to recover for services as an attorney. Verdict for defendant for no cause of action. From an order setting it aside as “against the evidence and the weight of evidence,” and granting a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to recover the balance ■due for services rendered by the plaintiff as° an attorney and counselor at law for the defendant in two certain actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens, and for divers other legal services and consultations. An account had been rendered by the plaintiff for $230.07, upon which the sum of $125 had been paid. The defendant claimed that when the account was rendered he disputed the amount thereof, and that in view of a settlement of the two actions without trial the plaintiff agreed to accept $187.12 in full, and that the same was to be paid by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. McDonald v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Algeo v. . DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Langlois v. HaywardNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Allgro v. DuncanNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Serles v. SerlesOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Serwer v. SerwerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Robinson v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Adams v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Emerson v. Universal Products Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API